Resolve the entrepreneur's dilemma: native or Cross Platform mobile applications: Development of native mobile applications Vs Development of Cross Platform applications

In recent years, there have been numerous discussions that generally tend to compare the benefits of developing native and cross-platform applications and what each form brings to mobile application development companies. The debate between the native platform and the cross-platform has generated innumerable arguments between mobile application developers and companies alike. Mobile Application Development companies tend to discuss and challenge each other with the advantages and disadvantages of current technologies and for good reason.

While many may argue these positive and negative aspects, what many companies do not realize is that, on top of all these applications, there is the customer experience that comes with that. But let's not get into the core of the customer experience and focus on what differentiates the two forms of mobile application development. Considering the way to do it, we must first establish the pros and cons of said mobile application development. Much of this is due to a number of factors that can undoubtedly help you as a developer decide the best way to do it. Let's start:

1. Cross Platform applications

As its name clearly suggests, the cross-platform involves the development of applications on a variety of platforms. This means that a code is usually created to run on multiple devices or platforms such as iOS, Android and even Windows using languages ?? such as Java or HTML. This method of development is best suited for applications that normally require simple interaction and do not need to access other peripherals.

Pros

- The most obvious fact that mobile application development companies prefer cross-platform development from a monetary perspective, given that it grants access to a variety of markets, can not be denied. This means a broader user database.

- This wide range of users means that very little effort will be devoted to the effective commercialization of the application. This is another added benefit for mobile application development companies that would point to a very general market.

- The fact that the application is only encoded once for multiple platforms can be quite profitable in nature. Let's not forget that a variety of different platforms allows for consistency and synchronization across multiple devices. This only adds to the convenience factor.

Cons

- While development on multiple platforms can have its benefits, having to write only one code in general, is part of a double-sided coin since the code should remain the same on all platforms. This could be problematic in the future since the application can not simply favor one platform over the other.

- As mentioned above, a mobile application development company can not have a preference in terms of platforms. Therefore, different interfaces could have their own complexities.

2. Native applications

As you may have guessed, developing natively refers to the development of your application on a single platform. This means that the application is built from scratch and does not borrow the existing coding properties; Built from scratch to adapt to a single platform. This also means that careful attention must be paid to the language of choice, be it Java, Swift, etc.

Pros

- What appears to be a scam for Cross-Platform development is a benefit here. The problem with native development is that these applications will seek to benefit greatly from just being on a platform. This exclusivity will allow mobile application development companies to take full advantage of the power available to them.

- They become easier to use by taking full advantage since the user base is more accustomed to the general interface and adds depth for better integration.

- Developing natively also provides more time and effort to focus solely on one platform to get the best possible result.

Cons

- Undoubtedly, developing applications natively is more expensive for mobile application development companies.

- The idea of ?? having more time also has its drawbacks, since it requires a much longer development cycle to comply with each specification of the platform.

- Unlike cross-platform development that involves multiple platforms, the native development of an application will focus on a single platform, which ultimately means a significantly reduced target market. While that may not be all bad, it provides a perspective of missed opportunities.

With these pros and cons in mind, it provides a better understanding in terms of what factors come into play for mobile application development companies. While cross-platform development focuses on the number of users, native applications focus on the user's overall experience.

While the numbers are excellent, it is important to understand that the user experience counts on everything else. Most likely, if a user stops using an application for some reason, it is most likely never to use it again. So keep that in mind as well when you start developing applications.

Also others Articles:

BloggingMind